Danny Harris, the executive director of Transportation Alternatives, an advocacy organization, said in a statement that “Governor Cuomo, a supposed champion for immigrants and the working poor, has failed to protect 40,000 low-wage, mostly immigrant workers in New York.”
With his veto, Mr. Harris added, the governor had “blocked a critical path forward for new transportation alternatives that address congestion, reduce emissions and improve access to opportunity for all New Yorkers.”
The governor’s move won praise in some quarters.
“Kudos to @NYGovCuomo for keeping this off the streets of New York,” William J. Bratton, a former New York City police commissioner, wrote on Twitter.
The legislation, which was passed in June, would have allowed cities and towns around the state to set local rules for electric scooters and bicycles. Scooter rental companies like Bird and Lime would not have been allowed to operate in Manhattan.
Still, the scooter companies, which have spent heavily to lobby city and state lawmakers in hopes of opening up New York streets to their products, had welcomed the bill. On Thursday, one of the companies, Lime, said it was ready to see Mr. Cuomo’s concerns addressed.
“While it’s disappointing that this important bill will not become law this year, we’re hopeful that the administration will work swiftly with legislative leaders to improve mobility for all New Yorkers early in the New Year,” Phil Jones, Lime’s senior government relations director, said in a statement.
Several cities in New Jersey have experimented with adding electric-scooter rentals to their streets under a state law passed in May, with at least two ending their programs after problems emerged.